For many Christians around the world, tithing is an issue that is surrounded by controversy. They don't know whether the Bible permits or requires it or not. Some look to the foundations of Christendom for support on this issue. Existing at the foundations of the faith are patriarchs such as Abraham. Those who examine his life will discover that Abraham did not tithe.
The misconception that Abraham paid tithes is rooted in an incident that takes place in the book of Genesis chapter fourteen. The incident entails a battle in which Abraham engaged after lot, his nephew was captured and taken away among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot's captors were identified as the four kings.
Along with the captives, the kings had also taken valuable possessions. The people's food was taken. So were all the properties of Lot. Clearly, The patriarch's quest was one of revenge, restoration and justice.
The patriarch defeated the four kings. He had help in doing this though. Fighting alongside him were other men such as the three hundred and eighteen men from his household and his allies mentioned in chapter thirteen, Aner, Mamre and Eshcol. The Lord was with him in battle also, and this was the main reason for his victory. He did however, also have the help of other men.
The customs in those days was to divide the spoils of war after victory and it is in this context that Abraham's issuing of one tenth of the plunder to Melchizedek should be seen. It is impossible to argue that Melchizedek was there but was not in the battle. The fact that Melchidezek also happened to be a priest of God does not in itself make the act one of tithing. An even if he was not with the patriarch during battle, the act still does not qualify as tithing as it more resembles the customs of bestowing a gift after or before a blessing as is seen with Isaac and his sons. Later on the patriarch asks that the other allies be given their share of the spoils.
There is also the fact that tithes are calculated as a percentage of the giver's possessions. The spoils accessed by Abraham would hardly qualify as all his possessions. The patriarch refuses to acknowledge them as his and rejects the King of Sodom's offer for him to take over the spoils explaining that he has taken an oath to God promising not to take anything.
Additionally tithing is a frequent, habitual act. This is why today's tithers use weekly, bi-weekly or monthly routines. This was a single activity with no evidence of repetition thereafter.
This patriarch's actions in Genesis fourteen cannot be used as strong evidence in favor of tithing. He was not following a requirement to give a portion of his earnings or properties to the Lord. He was simply ensuring that those who fought a hard battle and won received their just rewards.
The misconception that Abraham paid tithes is rooted in an incident that takes place in the book of Genesis chapter fourteen. The incident entails a battle in which Abraham engaged after lot, his nephew was captured and taken away among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot's captors were identified as the four kings.
Along with the captives, the kings had also taken valuable possessions. The people's food was taken. So were all the properties of Lot. Clearly, The patriarch's quest was one of revenge, restoration and justice.
The patriarch defeated the four kings. He had help in doing this though. Fighting alongside him were other men such as the three hundred and eighteen men from his household and his allies mentioned in chapter thirteen, Aner, Mamre and Eshcol. The Lord was with him in battle also, and this was the main reason for his victory. He did however, also have the help of other men.
The customs in those days was to divide the spoils of war after victory and it is in this context that Abraham's issuing of one tenth of the plunder to Melchizedek should be seen. It is impossible to argue that Melchizedek was there but was not in the battle. The fact that Melchidezek also happened to be a priest of God does not in itself make the act one of tithing. An even if he was not with the patriarch during battle, the act still does not qualify as tithing as it more resembles the customs of bestowing a gift after or before a blessing as is seen with Isaac and his sons. Later on the patriarch asks that the other allies be given their share of the spoils.
There is also the fact that tithes are calculated as a percentage of the giver's possessions. The spoils accessed by Abraham would hardly qualify as all his possessions. The patriarch refuses to acknowledge them as his and rejects the King of Sodom's offer for him to take over the spoils explaining that he has taken an oath to God promising not to take anything.
Additionally tithing is a frequent, habitual act. This is why today's tithers use weekly, bi-weekly or monthly routines. This was a single activity with no evidence of repetition thereafter.
This patriarch's actions in Genesis fourteen cannot be used as strong evidence in favor of tithing. He was not following a requirement to give a portion of his earnings or properties to the Lord. He was simply ensuring that those who fought a hard battle and won received their just rewards.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about whether Abraham did not tithe, you can pay a visit to the web pages online here today. Details are available at http://www.abraham-did-not-tithe.com now.
No comments :
Post a Comment